0.04/0.12	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_9092 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.04/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.32	% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
0.12/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.32	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.32	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 13:28:34 EDT 2023
0.12/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.46	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lP4uDF76kU/Vampire---4.8_9092
0.17/0.46	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.17/0.52	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
0.17/0.52	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.52	# Starting lpo1_fix with 540s (3) cores
0.17/0.52	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.52	# Starting almost_fo_4 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.52	# Starting new_ho_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.52	# Starting pre_casc_4 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.52	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.52	# full_lambda_9 with pid 9272 completed with status 0
0.17/0.52	# Result found by full_lambda_9
0.17/0.52	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
0.17/0.52	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.52	# Starting lpo1_fix with 540s (3) cores
0.17/0.52	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.52	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
0.17/0.52	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSMMSBN
0.17/0.52	# partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN
0.17/0.52	# Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.17/0.52	# Starting full_lambda_5 with 15s (1) cores
0.17/0.52	# full_lambda_5 with pid 9277 completed with status 0
0.17/0.52	# Result found by full_lambda_5
0.17/0.52	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
0.17/0.52	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.52	# Starting lpo1_fix with 540s (3) cores
0.17/0.52	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.52	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
0.17/0.52	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSMMSBN
0.17/0.52	# partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN
0.17/0.52	# Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.17/0.52	# Starting full_lambda_5 with 15s (1) cores
0.17/0.52	# Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
0.17/0.52	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.17/0.52	
0.17/0.52	# Proof found!
0.17/0.52	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.52	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_22, type, is_of: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_23, type, all_of: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_25, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_72, type, l_some: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_123, type, nat: $i).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_127, type, n_some: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_142, type, n_pl: $i > $i > $i).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_147, type, diffprop: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_148, type, d_29_ii: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_149, type, iii: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_155, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_156, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.17/0.52	thf(decl_157, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.17/0.52	thf(def_d_29_ii, axiom, ((d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:((n_some @ (diffprop @ X1 @ X184))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lP4uDF76kU/Vampire---4.8_9092', def_d_29_ii)).
0.17/0.52	thf(def_all_of, axiom, ((all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:(((is_of @ X4 @ X3)=>(X2 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lP4uDF76kU/Vampire---4.8_9092', def_all_of)).
0.17/0.52	thf(def_is_of, axiom, ((is_of)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:((X2 @ X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lP4uDF76kU/Vampire---4.8_9092', def_is_of)).
0.17/0.52	thf(def_iii, axiom, ((iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:((n_some @ (diffprop @ X185 @ X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lP4uDF76kU/Vampire---4.8_9092', def_iii)).
0.17/0.52	thf(def_n_some, axiom, ((n_some)=(l_some @ nat)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lP4uDF76kU/Vampire---4.8_9092', def_n_some)).
0.17/0.52	thf(satz20a, axiom, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X262:$i]:((in @ X262 @ nat))) @ (^[X263:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4 @ nat))) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((d_29_ii @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4) @ (n_pl @ X263 @ X4))=>(d_29_ii @ X1 @ X263))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lP4uDF76kU/Vampire---4.8_9092', satz20a)).
0.17/0.52	thf(satz20c, conjecture, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ nat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X284:$i]:((in @ X284 @ nat))) @ (^[X285:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4 @ nat))) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((iii @ X1 @ X285)<=(iii @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4) @ (n_pl @ X285 @ X4)))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lP4uDF76kU/Vampire---4.8_9092', satz20c)).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((d_29_ii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((is_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i > $o]:((Z1 @ Z0)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_10, plain, ((iii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z1 @ Z0))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_iii])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_11, plain, ((d_29_ii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, def_n_some])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_12, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_13, plain, ((iii)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ Z1 @ Z0))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, def_n_some])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X465:$i]:(((in @ X465 @ nat)=>![X464:$i]:(((in @ X464 @ nat)=>![X463:$i]:(((in @ X463 @ nat)=>((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ (n_pl @ X465 @ X463) @ (n_pl @ X464 @ X463)))=>(l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X465 @ X464))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz20a]), c_0_11]), c_0_12])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ~(![X370:$i]:(((in @ X370 @ nat)=>![X369:$i]:(((in @ X369 @ nat)=>![X368:$i]:(((in @ X368 @ nat)=>((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ (n_pl @ X369 @ X368) @ (n_pl @ X370 @ X368)))=>(l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X369 @ X370)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz20c])]), c_0_13]), c_0_12])])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X625:$i, X626:$i, X627:$i]:((~(in @ X625 @ nat)|(~(in @ X626 @ nat)|(~(in @ X627 @ nat)|(~(l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ (n_pl @ X625 @ X627) @ (n_pl @ X626 @ X627)))|(l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X625 @ X626))))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ((in @ esk1_0 @ nat)&((in @ esk2_0 @ nat)&((in @ esk3_0 @ nat)&((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ (n_pl @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0) @ (n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0)))&~(l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0)))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i, X5:$i]:(((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ X1 @ X4))|~((in @ X1 @ nat))|~((in @ X4 @ nat))|~((in @ X5 @ nat))|~((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X5) @ (n_pl @ X4 @ X5)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ (n_pl @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0) @ (n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk3_0 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk1_0 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk2_0 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ~((l_some @ nat @ (diffprop @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.17/0.52	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), c_0_20]), c_0_21]), c_0_22])]), c_0_23]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.52	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.52	# Parsed axioms                        : 385
0.17/0.52	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 263
0.17/0.52	# Initial clauses                      : 215
0.17/0.52	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 58
0.17/0.52	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 157
0.17/0.52	# Processed clauses                    : 292
0.17/0.52	# ...of these trivial                  : 5
0.17/0.52	# ...subsumed                          : 66
0.17/0.52	# ...remaining for further processing  : 221
0.17/0.52	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 20
0.17/0.52	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.52	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.17/0.52	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.17/0.52	# Generated clauses                    : 363
0.17/0.52	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 345
0.17/0.52	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.52	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.17/0.52	# Paramodulations                      : 249
0.17/0.52	# Factorizations                       : 2
0.17/0.52	# NegExts                              : 2
0.17/0.52	# Equation resolutions                 : 24
0.17/0.52	# Total rewrite steps                  : 63
0.17/0.52	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.52	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.52	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.52	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.52	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.52	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.52	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.52	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.52	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.52	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.52	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.52	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.52	# Current number of processed clauses  : 102
0.17/0.52	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
0.17/0.52	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.52	#    Negative unit clauses             : 7
0.17/0.52	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 76
0.17/0.52	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 298
0.17/0.52	# ...number of literals in the above   : 1207
0.17/0.52	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.52	# Current number of archived clauses   : 107
0.17/0.52	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2661
0.17/0.52	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 782
0.17/0.52	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 63
0.17/0.52	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
0.17/0.52	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.52	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
0.17/0.52	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.17/0.52	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.17/0.52	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.52	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 42948
0.17/0.52	
0.17/0.52	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.52	# User time                : 0.050 s
0.17/0.52	# System time              : 0.005 s
0.17/0.52	# Total time               : 0.055 s
0.17/0.52	# Maximum resident set size: 4532 pages
304.71/51.00	
304.71/51.00	# -------------------------------------------------
304.71/51.00	# User time                : 0.059 s
304.71/51.00	# System time              : 0.007 s
304.71/51.00	# Total time               : 0.066 s
304.71/51.00	# Maximum resident set size: 2340 pages
304.71/51.00	% E---3.1 exiting
304.71/51.00	EOF